Guest post: Join us on Wednesday to defend education and fight the cuts

Posted on Mon 7th Nov 2011, 4:41am
This is a guest post by Michael Chessum from National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts

This Wednesday, tens of thousands are expected to attend the national demonstration against fees, cuts and privatisation in education. The march will leave Malet Street at 12pm and go through Trafalgar Square and up the Strand, before passing the occupation at St Paul’s to rally at Moorgate Junction. The decision to march on the City, rather than to Parliament, will highlight the fact that whilst the banks caused the economic crisis, students- and millions of ordinary working people in the UK- are paying for and suffering its consequences.

Our education is not for sale

We want to send a message on Wednesday that we won’t let the Government hand over education to the markets. Education should be a public service, accessible to all– not a corporate enterprise.

Protesters therefore intend to derail the government’s higher education white paper. This has been widely described as a chaotic and regressive attempt to introduce markets and private providers into education, effectively ending it as a public service.

Solidarity with electricians and the hardest hit

Students will be joined on the day by thousands of striking electricians, who are marching with Unite the Union in protest at a 35% national pay cut. NCAFC is supporting the electricians’ strike as part of a broader opposition to pay and pensions cuts ahead of the November 30th strikes.

The demonstration will then finish at Moorgate Junction, next to London Metropolitan University, which is one of the hardest hit institutions in the UK. London Met has the highest percentage of working class students in the country, with more black and minority ethnic students than the whole of the elite Russell Group combined.

Ending a society run by and for the 1%

The last academic year saw a 70% cut to London Met’s undergraduate course portfolio and a move to more vocational-style degrees, and even greater cuts are expected over the next year. Meanwhile FTSE 100 directors' pay has risen by over 50%.

As Claire Locke, President of London Met students’ union, has pointed out, the government’s policies ‘have led to a disproportionate attack on our most vulnerable students. We have already had students drop out due to financial hardship and lack of student support.’

We must stand together and build a mass movement to fight the unjustifiable fees and reckless cuts. Let’s make November 9th a day Cameron and Clegg can’t ignore and won’t forget.

Guest post: How I saved my local nursery

Posted on Sat 29th Oct 2011, 1:40pm
This is a guest post by Lucy Reese, mother of Angus (6), Stanley (2) and Max (6 months)



A few years ago, like all good New Labour voters, I was obviously all for public services, but other than the bins and the NHS had very little need for them. Then I had kids. And everything changed. I’d always worked and was determined to do so after I had kids. My job as a TV producer paid quite well, but even so forking out nearly £400 a week in childcare – for a fairly bog standard private nursery – was pretty eye-watering. It was much more than my mortgage. By the time my lovely son was two and a half I knew I couldn’t carry on working the hours I did without going completely bat-shit mental. A ghastly programme about The Spice Girls was the tipping point. I had no work life balance and had to change the way I worked.

Fortunately, by this time my son had moved to a brilliant council run nursery called Caversham Children’s Centre, in Kentish Town, North London. I loved everything about it and it was affordable – the fees were about half what we’d been paying before. It gave me the breathing space to work out how I could change direction. I found I could do some TV stuff from home and also began to pick up work in F.E colleges, which I loved. I had another baby, started a PGCE and got more hours in the college. Throughout all these changes the nursery was a constant – our second boy went there too.

Since both my husband and I are self employed – he makes websites – we can’t afford to turn down work just because it doesn’t fit in with school holidays. I got work teaching summer schools so we started using the brilliant holiday play schemes run out of Camden Square Playcentre. It may sound cheesy, but these services are like extended family for millions of people like us. We can’t plead abject poverty, but to keep working, we need good quality affordable childcare. We want to spend some time with our kids and provide them with emotional security – we just couldn’t do this and pay private sector childcare fees.

Fast forward to the 2010 election. THEY got in and I remember saying to my husband that I reckoned the nursery and the playcentre would be for the chop. People like Cameron have never needed public services and think only lazy scroungers use them. By the end of 2010, it was announced that the playcentre would close in 2012 – then we found out in January of this year that the nursery would be closing in August.

When I got the letter about the nursery closing I burst into tears. Pregnant and hormonal, I just couldn’t handle the news. But I refused to go down without a fight. Fortunately all the other parents felt the same and to cut a long story short we worked together and although the nursery did close in August, it has recently reopened as the Caversham Community Nursery after we convinced the council to transfer management to a local community association.

The campaign was draining and involved dozens of meetings, hassling local councillors, standing in the street outside the Co-op and making a series of deputations to Camden Council. I gave birth in the middle of the campaign – baby Max has been to more council meetings than you could care to mention, both in and out of the womb.

So why did the campaign work? First off, we decided to work with our local Labour councillors, rather than harangue them for closing the nursery. We also pooled our skills. One of our group was a management consultant and produced an amazing business plan. Another mother is a PA and a brilliant organizer – with access to free printing facilties for leaflets! I used my contacts in local politics and media and gave the campaign focus with a Facebook group. The group’s leader, another TV producer, created amazingly convincing documents and sat up till the early hours refining our deputations to the council. It was bloody hard work but it paid off and though the process was at times frustrating, it was also incredibly empowering and shows what can be done if you work collectively. It made me understand the importance of local government and the experience has made me keen to stand as a local councillor – something that previously would have had about as much appeal as drinking a bucket of cold sick.

I’m now back on the campaign trail again and have started an action group to save Camden Square Playcentre – yes, it is just down the road from the Amy shrine. This is a truly amazing place that provides holiday play schemes, after school clubs, breakfast clubs and under 5s drop ins. Black kids play with white kids, posh kids play with poor kids and disabled kids play with able bodied kids. The brilliant staff are trained in everything from child protection to child psychology – the idea that they could be replaced by some “Big Society” volunteers is frankly insulting. The playcentre keeps single parents off benefits and keeps stay at home mums with toddlers sane. It gives boisterous six year old boys somewhere to let off steam after school and kids in wheelchairs the chance to make friends with kids from mainstream schools. If this sounds like utopian bullshit, sorry, but it’s the kind of service that actually makes the world a better place.

We’ve had our first meeting and are hopeful that there is a chance that we can do what we did with the nursery and get a voluntary sector provider to take over the running of the service.

Please sign our petition - http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/save-camden-square-playcentre.html - we still need all the help we can get. Thank you for reading.

Lucy is giving a talk at 2pm on Saturday 29th October at Occupy Finsbury Square. You can email her at lucy_reese33@yahoo.co.uk

Introducing UK Uncut Legal Action

Posted on Fri 28th Oct 2011, 10:46am
This is a guest blog post from UK Uncut Legal Action. Follow them on Twitter and Facebook and check out their website



When activists start talking about court cases, evidence, expert witnesses and meetings with lawyers, it generally means that either they or their friends will be going through a tough and stressful time. Too often it is those people willing to stick their necks out to fight injustice that are dragged through the courts. But not always. Criminal damage to us doesn’t always mean supergluing yourself to Topshop, we believe it is criminal for public servants to act unlawfully, especially when these acts reflect a greed and self-interest that damage us all.

UK Uncut Legal Action is a new, spin-off project, separate to- but inspired by- UK Uncut and their fight for an alternative to the cuts. UK Uncut have shown that the cuts are a political choice, not an economic necessity and that this choice is driven by the interests of big business, the finance sector and wealthy individuals, not caring for people.

Today, UK Uncut Legal Action has announced that it is threatening a legal challenge in the High Court over HMRC’s ‘sweetheart’ tax deal with the investment bank giant, Goldman Sachs. The crux of the matter appears to be that back in the 1990s, Goldman Sachs didn’t want people to know just how much money their bankers were being paid, and they allegedly didn’t fancy paying all of their National Insurance contributions. Reportedly, they set up a new company in the British Virgin Islands, and bought into a scheme called Employment Beneficiary Trusts. It wasn’t until 2005, after much legal wrangling, the courts declared that these Trusts were tax avoiding schemes, and it was time to pay back £30 million that they’d saved through using these schemes.

But Goldman Sachs didn’t feel like paying back the £30 million and fought tooth and nail in the courts against reimbursing the public purse. Time ticked on, and it wasn’t until 2010 that a judge threw out the claim from the Bank that their true employer was in the British Virgin Islands. Goldman Sachs’s debt to society now stood at the £30 million, plus £10 million in interest.

Goldman Sachs baulked at paying back what they owed, and so in late 2010, it’s been said in the press that they did what any self-respecting wannabe tax dodger does; they wined and dined Dave Harnett, HMRC’s top tax man. By the end of the brandy and cigars, it was all sorted. Goldman Sachs would pay back the original £30 mil and Dave would forget about the £10 million interest. Who needs it? You can’t buy many books, nurses or school meals with it anyway.

As the secret ‘sweetheart’ deal came to light, it all got a bit embarrassing in the press and in parliament. Dave Hartnett suggested to a Select Committee that it was a junior official’s error because of a misinterpretation of the law. According to the Guardian this month, HMRC sources privately confirm that £10m of taxpayers’ money was thrown away because of a “technical mistake” by an unidentified official, junior to Hartnett, who misinterpreted the law.

As anyone who has had any dealings with HMRC will know, there are procedures, policies and forms of many, many pages that must be filled in, in the right order and by the right date. We can’t buy Dave Hartnett a couple of cocktails and he’ll look the other way when it comes to our tax returns or National Insurance contributions.

This is at the heart of our legal action. We are saying that if was a genuine mistake, then it can be rectified and the money paid back. And being the reasonable people that we are, we have given them a couple of weeks to do so. If not though, we will see them in court, as we believe that this handshake agreement is unlawful because, reportedly, Dave didn’t follow HMRC’s own procedures. So if it’s not quashed, Dave’s dodgy deal could land him in the dock.
Displaying posts 163 - 165 of 281 in total

Latest posts

A medical bill from 1931
Sat 8th Oct 2011, 11:39am
Summary of support for Block the Bridge, Block the Bill
Sat 8th Oct 2011, 10:41am
Support from GMB, Compass and War on Want
Sat 8th Oct 2011, 10:32am
Guest post: Why I Will Be Helping to Block The Bridge on Sunday
Thu 6th Oct 2011, 4:03pm
A message of support from Len McCluskey
Thu 6th Oct 2011, 3:44pm
A message of support from Mark Serwotka
Wed 5th Oct 2011, 5:48pm
Join the Clown Doctors on the Bridge
Wed 5th Oct 2011, 5:22pm
Got a few quid spare? Help transform Westminster Bridge!
Tue 4th Oct 2011, 11:22am
A message of support from George Monbiot
Tue 4th Oct 2011, 10:23am
Guest post: What "Any Qualified Provider" means for the NHS
Mon 3rd Oct 2011, 3:34pm
Displaying posts 171 - 180 of 281 in total